• 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM ET
Contact Us
Near Me
Medientsky Billing - Elevating Healthcare Revenue
Get Free Billing Audit

Revenue Cycle

Orthopedic medical billing and coding services
Revenue Cycle

Complete Guide to Orthopedic Medical Billing Services

/

Orthopedic medical billing involves more than submitting claims after a patient visit. Orthopedic practices handle office evaluations, imaging, injections, fracture care, surgeries, postoperative visits, and other procedures that each have specific coding and billing requirements. Accurate documentation, correct CPT and ICD-10 coding, appropriate modifiers, and consistent follow-up all play a role in getting claims processed correctly. Why Is Orthopedic Medical Billing Different? Orthopedic billing can be complex because the specialty includes many procedures, surgical services, diagnostic services, and follow-up visits. A single patient may receive several services during one episode of care, and each service must be reported according to the applicable coding and payer rules. Orthopedic practices also need to understand global surgery rules, NCCI edits, procedure-specific requirements, and modifiers. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons provides dedicated coding and reimbursement resources for orthopedic professionals, while CMS publishes the rules and coding guidance used for Medicare claims. Common Orthopedic Services That Require Billing Orthopedic medical billing may cover a wide range of services depending on the practice and its specialties. Common examples include: Office evaluation and management visits Fracture and dislocation treatment Joint injections Arthroscopy Joint replacement procedures Tendon and ligament procedures Casting and splinting Musculoskeletal imaging Postoperative visits Physical medicine and rehabilitation services Treatment of sports-related injuries Each service needs to be supported by appropriate documentation and reported using the correct codes. How Does Orthopedic Medical Billing Work? Orthopedic medical billing usually follows a series of steps from patient registration to final payment. Each step affects the next, so an error during registration or coding can create problems later in the claims process. Patient Registration and Insurance Verification The process starts with collecting accurate patient and insurance information. The billing team verifies coverage, eligibility, benefits, and other payer requirements before services are provided when possible. This step can help identify coverage limitations, authorization requirements, and incorrect insurance information before a claim is submitted. Documentation and Medical Coding The provider’s documentation is reviewed to determine the appropriate diagnosis and procedure codes. Orthopedic coding may involve ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes, CPT procedure codes, HCPCS codes, and applicable modifiers. The code selection should reflect the services actually performed and documented. Orthopedic coding resources from AAOS cover CPT codes, ICD-10, E/M services, modifiers, and other reimbursement topics. Claim Submission Once the claim has been coded and reviewed, it is submitted to the appropriate payer. Claims should contain accurate patient information, provider details, diagnosis codes, procedure codes, modifiers, and other required information. Clean claims reduce the need for corrections and resubmissions. Payment Posting After the payer processes the claim, payments and adjustments are posted to the patient’s account. The billing team compares the payer’s explanation of benefits with the expected reimbursement and identifies balances that need additional attention. Denial Management and A/R Follow-Up Not every claim is paid on the first submission. Denials may result from coding issues, missing information, eligibility problems, authorization requirements, payer edits, or documentation concerns. The billing team reviews the reason for the denial, corrects the underlying issue when appropriate, submits an appeal or corrected claim when permitted, and follows up on outstanding accounts. Understanding Global Surgery in Orthopedic Billing Global surgery rules are particularly important for orthopedic practices because many orthopedic procedures involve postoperative care. Medicare uses global surgery indicators to identify the postoperative period associated with a procedure. CMS identifies 000, 010, and 090 global surgery indicators. A 000-day period generally applies to procedures where the related preoperative and postoperative work is included on the procedure day. A 010-day period includes the procedure day and a 10-day postoperative period. A 090-day period applies to major surgery and includes a 1-day preoperative period and a 90-day postoperative period. Understanding the applicable global period helps billing teams determine when a postoperative service is included in the surgical payment and when a service may be separately reportable. Orthopedic Billing Modifiers Modifiers provide additional information about how or why a service was performed. They are especially important in orthopedic medical billing because the same procedure code can have different reporting requirements depending on the circumstances. Common modifiers that orthopedic practices may encounter include: 1)  Modifier 24: Unrelated E/M service during a postoperative period 2) Modifier 25: Significant, separately identifiable E/M service 3) Modifier 57: Decision for surgery 4) Modifier 58: Staged or related procedure during the postoperative period 5) Modifier 78: Unplanned return to the operating or procedure room 6) Modifier 79: Unrelated procedure during the postoperative period 7) Modifier 59: Distinct procedural service when applicable These modifiers should only be used when the documented clinical circumstances support them. CMS specifically states that modifiers should not be added simply to bypass an NCCI edit. Common Orthopedic Billing Problems Orthopedic practices can face several billing challenges during the claim lifecycle. Some common issues include: Incorrect CPT or ICD-10 coding Missing or unsupported modifiers Incomplete clinical documentation Incorrect patient or insurance information Authorization problems NCCI procedure-to-procedure edits Global surgery billing errors Unresolved claim denials Delayed A/R follow-up Incorrect payment posting NCCI procedure-to-procedure edits are designed to prevent inappropriate payment when certain code combinations should not be reported together. CMS provides current NCCI guidance and edit files that billing teams can use when reviewing claims. How Can Orthopedic Practices Improve Their Billing? Improving orthopedic medical billing starts with consistent processes. Practices can review their billing workflow and identify where claims are most often delayed or denied. Useful steps include: Verify insurance information before appointments and procedures. Review documentation before finalizing codes. Use current CPT and ICD-10 coding resources. Check applicable NCCI edits before claim submission. Review modifiers carefully instead of applying them automatically. Monitor claims after submission. Track recurring denial reasons. Follow up on unpaid claims consistently. Review accounts receivable by payer and aging. Update billing procedures when payer or CMS rules change. Regular review can help practices identify patterns instead of treating every denial as an isolated issue. What Should You Look for in an Orthopedic Medical Billing Service? The right orthopedic medical billing service should understand the specialty rather than treating orthopedic

Top private medical billing companies in the US for healthcare practices
Revenue Cycle

Top Private Medical Billing Companies in the US

/

Choosing a medical billing company is an important decision for any healthcare practice that wants better control over claims, payments, and accounts receivable. This guide covers private medical billing companies in the US, what they offer, who they may be a good fit for, and what to consider before signing a contract. The demand for outsourced billing continues to grow. Grand View Research estimates that the U.S. medical billing outsourcing market was worth $6.95 billion in 2025 and could reach $17.69 billion by 2033. Why Are Medical Billing Services in Demand? Medical billing has become more difficult to manage as payer requirements, coding rules, claim volumes, and administrative responsibilities continue to grow. Outsourcing allows healthcare practices to bring in billing specialists without building a large internal revenue cycle team. Claim denials are another reason practices look for outside support. Recent research has reported that around 12% of initial claims can be denied, although the rate varies depending on the payer, provider, specialty, and type of claim. For a busy practice, even a small percentage of unpaid claims can create a large amount of work. How We Evaluated These Companies We looked at the services each company publicly offers, including medical billing, revenue cycle management, coding, denial management, credentialing, claims processing, and related healthcare technology. We also considered the types of healthcare organizations each company says it serves. The “Best for” descriptions are included to make the list easier to understand. They are not independent rankings or claims that one company is better than another. Top Private Medical Billing Companies in the US The companies below serve different parts of the healthcare market. Some focus more on independent practices, while others provide technology or revenue cycle services for larger physician groups and health systems. Medientsky Billing Best for: Practices looking for end-to-end revenue cycle support Medientsky Billing provides medical billing and revenue cycle management services for healthcare providers across the US. Its services include medical billing and claims processing, medical coding, denial management, credentialing, billing audits, and EHR/EMR integration. The company says its billing specialists support more than 30 medical specialties. Its RCM approach covers several stages of the billing process, from patient intake through payment and follow-up. For practices dealing with recurring denials, aging A/R, or multiple billing responsibilities, having one team manage several parts of the revenue cycle can make day-to-day operations easier. BillingParadise Best for: Small and mid-sized practices with broader RCM needs BillingParadise provides front-end, middle, and back-end revenue cycle services. Its offerings include eligibility verification, prior authorization, medical coding, claims submission, payment posting, denial management, A/R follow-up, and credentialing. The company also says it works with more than 25 EHR systems and supports independent practices, group practices, and hospitals. For a practice that wants to outsource several billing functions rather than manage separate vendors for coding, claims, and A/R, this type of service model may be worth considering. Medwave Billing & Credentialing Best for: Practices that need billing and credentialing support Medwave provides medical billing and credentialing services for healthcare providers in the US. Combining these services can be useful for practices that need help with both ongoing claims and getting providers enrolled with insurance payers. For providers searching for a medical billing company in New York, it is also worth checking whether a billing company has experience with the payers and requirements relevant to the local market. Before choosing a company, ask which payers it regularly works with and whether credentialing is handled by the same team responsible for billing. AdvancedMD Best for: Independent private practices wanting billing and practice technology together AdvancedMD offers medical billing software along with managed revenue cycle services. Its RCM services include claims management, payment posting, denial and collection support, reporting, and account management. The company positions its services around independent physicians and private practices. It also offers EHR and practice management technology, allowing clinical, administrative, and financial workflows to work together. This can be useful for practices that prefer an integrated system instead of moving information between several separate platforms. athenahealth Best for: Growing practices and organizations with more complex billing needs athenahealth provides revenue cycle services covering areas such as registration, insurance verification, authorization management, coding, claim submission, payment posting, denial resolution, and reporting. Its athenaIDX product is designed for larger and more complex organizations, while athenaOne combines EHR, practice management, and revenue cycle functions for other healthcare practices. For a growing organization, the ability to support both everyday billing and more complex revenue cycle operations can be an important consideration. R1 Best for: Health systems and large provider organizations R1 focuses on enterprise revenue cycle management and works with health systems, physician groups, and other healthcare organizations. Its services combine revenue cycle operations with technology, automation, analytics, and other financial management tools. R1 is therefore a different type of option from a smaller billing company that mainly works with independent physician practices. Larger organizations considering an enterprise provider should look closely at implementation, integration, reporting, and the level of support available. DrChrono Best for: Independent practices looking for an integrated EHR and billing setup DrChrono combines EHR, practice management, payments, medical billing, and revenue cycle tools in one platform. It also provides managed billing services. Its RCM services include eligibility verification, claims submission, payment posting, denial management, and A/R follow-up. DrChrono also says its managed RCM service includes certified billers and coders and provides reporting. For smaller practices, keeping clinical and financial workflows within one connected system can reduce the need to transfer information between different platforms. Coronis Health Best for: Healthcare organizations needing broader RCM support Coronis Health provides revenue cycle services covering medical billing, coding, credentialing, collections, and other financial operations. Its broader service model may be useful for organizations that need help across multiple parts of their revenue cycle rather than simply sending claims to insurance companies. Larger provider groups should also look at how a company handles reporting, system integration, implementation, and communication across different locations. eClinicalWorks Best for: Practices looking for

Revenue cycle management services
Revenue Cycle

Revenue Cycle Management Services USA

/

Getting paid for healthcare services is rarely as simple as sending a claim and waiting for a payment. A patient may have inactive insurance. A procedure may require prior authorization. A claim may be rejected because of a coding issue. A payer may request additional documentation. Even after a claim is approved, the payment still has to be posted and reconciled. Each of these steps can affect a healthcare practice’s revenue. That is why many providers in the USA turn to revenue cycle management services. Instead of treating billing, claims, denials, and accounts receivable as separate tasks, RCM brings them together into one connected process. The goal is straightforward: help practices capture the revenue they have earned, reduce avoidable delays, and understand exactly what is happening with their financial performance. For practices considering RCM outsourcing, the real question isn’t simply which company can submit claims. It’s which partner can manage the entire revenue cycle, provide measurable results, work with existing technology, and give the practice visibility into its numbers. What Are Revenue Cycle Management Services? Revenue cycle management services cover the financial process that begins when a patient schedules an appointment and continues until the healthcare provider receives payment. A complete RCM workflow can include: The important part is how these functions work together. For example, if a patient’s insurance eligibility isn’t verified correctly, the problem can eventually appear as a denied claim. If the claim is denied and nobody follows up, it becomes an aging A/R balance. If that balance remains unresolved for too long, the practice may eventually have to write off money it could have collected. A good RCM process tries to catch the problem earlier. Medical Billing and RCM Are Not the Same Thing These terms are often used together, but there is a difference. Medical billing generally focuses on preparing and submitting claims, posting payments, following up on unpaid claims, and handling denials. Revenue cycle management covers a much wider portion of the financial process. RCM can begin with patient registration and insurance verification, continue through authorization, coding and claim submission, and then move into payment posting, denial management, A/R, patient collections, and reporting. Think of medical billing as one part of the revenue cycle. RCM looks at the whole journey. For a practice with a simple billing workflow, traditional medical billing may be enough. But if the practice is dealing with high denial rates, authorization problems, aging A/R, inconsistent collections, or limited financial visibility, a broader RCM approach may be more useful. Why Revenue Cycle Management Matters for US Healthcare Providers A practice can have a full schedule and still have a cash flow problem. The reason is simple. Patient volume doesn’t automatically translate into collected revenue. Consider a practice that submits 1,000 claims. If even a portion of those claims are rejected, denied, underpaid, or left without follow-up, a significant amount of money can remain tied up in the revenue cycle. That’s why RCM teams track specific performance indicators rather than looking only at total monthly collections. Common metrics include: HFMA’s revenue cycle guidance recommends measuring initial denial rates by both claim volume and dollars, along with metrics such as time from denial to appeal and time from denial to resolution. A 2026 HFMA AI implementation guide provides an example benchmark framework using 30 to 32 days in A/R, a 95% clean claim rate, a 5% to 6% denial rate, and 2.5% to 4.5% cost to collect. These are benchmark examples, not guarantees for every practice, and actual performance varies by specialty and payer mix. That distinction matters. A cardiology group and a primary care clinic shouldn’t necessarily be judged against exactly the same numbers. What matters most is establishing a baseline and measuring improvement. The RCM Process From Patient Visit to Payment Getting the basics right at registration saves a lot of headaches down the road. This is where you confirm the patient’s info is correct, check their insurance is actually active, and figure out what they’ll owe out of pocket. Catching a coverage problem here before the visit even happens is a lot easier than fighting a denied claim after the fact. Patient Registration and Insurance Verification The revenue cycle starts before the claim is created. Accurate patient demographics and insurance information are essential. The RCM team may verify whether coverage is active, confirm benefits, check the patient’s responsibility, and identify potential coverage problems. Catching an insurance issue before the appointment is much easier than trying to resolve it after the claim has been denied. Prior Authorization and Referrals Some procedures, medications, imaging services, and treatments require prior authorization. An RCM team can help identify authorization requirements, submit documentation, monitor requests, and keep authorization information connected to the patient’s account. This is especially important for specialties where procedures and advanced diagnostic services frequently require payer approval. Coding and Charge Capture Once care is provided, the services need to be accurately documented and coded. Depending on the service, this can involve ICD-10-CM, CPT, HCPCS, modifiers, and payer-specific billing requirements. A missing charge or incorrect code can affect reimbursement. It can also create unnecessary denials and additional work later. That’s why coding shouldn’t be treated as a quick step before submitting the claim. Claim Scrubbing and Electronic Submission Before a claim is sent to the payer, claim-scrubbing technology can check for common errors. Depending on the system, it may flag: Claims can then be transmitted electronically through a clearinghouse using EDI transactions. The objective is to catch preventable problems before they become payer rejections or denials. Payment Posting and ERA Once a payer processes a claim, the payment and remittance information need to be recorded accurately. Electronic remittance advice, or ERA, can automate part of this process. The RCM team should also compare expected reimbursement with actual payment. If a payer pays less than the contracted amount, that may require further investigation. This is where payment posting becomes more than data entry. Accurate reconciliation helps identify revenue that may otherwise go unnoticed.

Revenue Cycle

Reducing Claim Denials: Top 5 Strategies

/

Table of Contents Introduction Strategies Conclusion Claim denials are more than a nuisance—they’re a direct hit to your practice’s financial health. The American Medical Association estimates that one in five claims is initially denied, consuming countless staff hours to rework. The key is not just working denials faster, but preventing them from happening in the first place. Implement these five proactive strategies to reduce your claim denial rate and streamline your revenue cycle. Strategy 1: Front-End Scrub with Intelligent Software The best place to catch an error is before the claim is ever submitted. Invest in practice management or billing software with real-time claim scrubbing. These tools check for coding errors (CPT®/ICD-10 mismatches), missing information, and eligibility issues as you code, acting as a safety net for your billers. Strategy 2: Verify Eligibility & Benefits for Every Patient, Every TimeNever assume coverage is active. Conduct rigorous eligibility checks 24-48 hours before the appointment. Confirm: Active insurance status Coverage for specific services Copay, deductible, and coinsurance details Need for prior authorizations or referralsThis prevents denials for “no coverage” or “service not authorized.” Strategy 3: Master Medical Coding & DocumentationInaccurate coding is a top denial driver. Ensure your coders and clinicians are aligned. Provide Ongoing Coder Education: Keep them updated on annual CPT® and ICD-10 changes. Improve Clinical Documentation: Clinicians must document in detail to support the level of service (E/M) and medical necessity. Clear documentation is the foundation of clean claims. Strategy 4: Implement a Robust Pre-Authorization ProcessCreate a foolproof system for tracking and obtaining authorizations. Designate a point person and use a tracking log or software. A denied claim due to “no prior auth” is 100% preventable and often non-appealable. Strategy 5: Analyze Denial Data & Act on ItStop treating denials as isolated incidents. Track them by: Denial Reason Code (e.g., CO-22, CO-109) Payer Provider Service TypeThis data reveals patterns. Is one payer consistently denying for a specific reason? Is one provider’s documentation lacking? Use these insights to target training and address systemic issues. The Proactive Payoff: By shifting your focus from denial management to denial prevention, you can significantly reduce your initial denial rate, improve cash flow, and free up your staff to focus on more strategic tasks. Struggling with a high denial rate? Our expert billing team specializes in proactive claim scrubbing, meticulous follow-up, and denial analysis to maximize your clean claim submissions and reimbursements. Contact us for a free revenue cycle assessment.

Scroll to Top

Get a Quote

Get a Quote

Fill the following form to join the event

Established Practice

Startup Practice